I simply had to get this off my chest. I’ve had this scene in my head ever since I helped out at my company’s annual general meeting (AGM) in May, but I will probably never use it – at least not in the next five years or so as it simply doesn’t fit in any story I am writing or aim to write in the future.
I should probably describe the premise. I’m a student/apprentice working for a German-based “global player” with approximately 130,000 employees. In 2008 we had a revenue of 12 billion euros – an increase of 13% and this despite the financial crisis. So those were good conditions for a very smooth AGM as there were – in contrast to other global companies – no problems to report, really, as the company also operates in markets that are relatively independent from the overall economical development. That was until some shareholders decided to charge our directors with some pretty nasty accusations among others corruption and nepotism. I would never have guessed that shareholders would really come up with such stupid and totally vulgar questions – at an AGM no less! It felt as if they were virtually throwing tomatoes at our executives, because they decided that it would be fun.
In general, directors don’t answer directly to the questions or accusations shareholders make in order to not let the discussion getting out of hand but answer a bunch of questions after a question period. But I couldn’t help but imagine Darcy being in our CEO’s position (not that these two have anything in common
) and after some very tedious question rounds suddenly being asked about his personal life, namely an alleged relationship with Elizabeth Bennet, member of the board of Longbourn Industries, which is a competitor of Pemberley PLC, Darcy’s company. So this is how I would imagine Darcy’s reaction to such a question.
“I’d like to direct a question to the CEO, Mr. Darcy himself and ask him about the state of affairs in his personal life, especially his relationship with women.”
“Excuse me?” Richard had asked that before Darcy had had any chance to react to this statement and had completely forgotten that they were not to challenge the questions a shareholder asked. “How is the personal life of our CEO relevant at the AGM?”
“Well, if I have to be more blunt – do you have an affair with Elizabeth Bennet, Mr. Darcy?”
For a moment Darcy was taken aback by the venom with which the question was asked. He tried to remember the man’s name but couldn’t come up with it.
“I cannot imagine how the CEO’s love life might be relevant-“ Richard began anew but Darcy silenced him with a look and turned on the microphone in front of him.
“For those here in attendance who have not read the gossip rags in the last few months, Elizabeth Bennet is the newest member of the board of Longbourn Industries, one of our American competitors.”
“Which has done remarkably well the last year,” the man interjected. “Ever since she was promoted to be a member of the board and became ’acquainted‘ with you.”
“So, what do you mean to insinuate with that information here at the AGM of Pemberley PLC?”
“Come on, Mr. Darcy, don’t try to play me for a fool. Don’t you think that some of the most confidential data can best be gathered in bed?”
“So you are insinuating that I’ve been leaking out information to her due to a sexual relationship with Miss Elizabeth Bennet and that she’s been willing to have sex with me in order to gather confidential information? I’d rather be careful with that. And I can assure all of you that as of today I do not have and I have never had a sexual or romantical or whatever relationship with Elizabeth Bennet that goes beyond that of casual acquaintances caused by the fact that Charles Bingley, member of our board and my good friend, is engaged to her sister. Whatever the rumours about an alleged relationship with her may be, they are totally unfounded and hurt both mine and Miss Bennet’s professional reputation.”
“And what about the future?” The man simply didn’t want to stop.
“I beg your pardon?”
“You said that you currently don’t have and that you’ve never had a relationship with Miss Bennet – what about the future? Do you intend to enter into an alliance with her? After all, you will get to know her better now that your friend and her sister are about to get married.”
“I don’t see why the future of my private life – relationship with Elizabeth Bennet or not – has any relevance for this AGM, where we review the goings of the past fiscal year and give a careful forecasts to the future of Pemberley PLC. You will be kept informed about all events in the future that might affect our company… but not about my family planning. And if you wish to further insult my professional behaviour as both CEO and majority shareholder of Pemberley PLC, please do so without reference to my love life and without a connection to Elizabeth Bennet because there is none to speak of. With that I consider the discussion of my love life closed.”
I will probably never use this, but it feels good to see my thoughts posted here. And if I ever decided on continuing this idea somewhere in the future, I would still have this blog entry to work with